Planning & Operations Data Verification
eGridSync ensures accurate, consistent data provision to Planning Coordinators, Transmission Planners, and Reliability Coordinators with comprehensive verification, quality checks, and audit-ready documentation.
What is NERC MOD-032?
MOD-032 ensures accurate, timely, and complete data exchange between entities and planning coordinators for reliable system modeling.
Data Provision Requirements
Accurate, consistent data must be provided to Planning Coordinators, Transmission Planners, and Reliability Coordinators
Static & Dynamic Data
Covers equipment ratings, impedances, topology (static) and generator/load dynamic models
Data Quality Focus
Emphasis on data accuracy, timeliness, consistency, and completeness across all planning entities
Reliable Planning
Accurate data enables reliable planning studies, adequacy assessments, and operational readiness
Who Must Comply with MOD-032?
MOD-032 applies to multiple functional entities responsible for providing planning and operations data.
Generator Owners
Provide generator capability, dynamic models, and operating parameters
Transmission Owners
Provide transmission line data, equipment ratings, topology
Distribution Providers
Provide load data and BES distribution facility information
Load-Serving Entities
Provide demand forecasts and load characteristics
Data Recipients: Planning Coordinators (PC), Transmission Planners (TP), and Reliability Coordinators (RC) rely on this data for planning studies, operational assessments, and reliability analysis.
Understanding Data Quality & Consistency Requirements
MOD-032 requires comprehensive data management ensuring accuracy across multiple planning entities.
Static Data Requirements
Static data includes transmission line impedances, equipment ratings (MW, MVA, voltage), transformer tap settings, shunt device parameters, and system topology. Data must be current, accurate, and reflect actual field conditions including recent equipment changes or reconfigurations.
Dynamic Model Data
Dynamic models include generator models, excitation system models (AVR), turbine/governor models, load models, and FACTS device models. Models must be validated against field performance and updated when equipment changes. PSS®E, PSCAD, or equivalent formats required.
Data Consistency Across Entities
Same facility must have identical data across all planning entities. Inconsistencies create model errors and unreliable study results. Data synchronization processes, single-source-of-truth architectures, and regular reconciliation prevent discrepancies.
Timeliness Requirements
Data must be updated within specified timeframes when changes occur. Typical requirements: 30-90 days for planned changes, immediate for emergency modifications affecting planning. Late or missing data submissions create compliance violations and planning blind spots.
What eGridSync Delivers for MOD-032 Compliance
Inputs Required for MOD-032 Compliance
To ensure data quality and MOD-032 compliance, eGridSync requires:
| Item | Examples | Why Required |
|---|---|---|
| Planning Models | PSS®E, PowerFactory, PSCAD cases from PC/TP/RC | Baseline for consistency verification |
| Dynamic Models | Generator, excitation, governor, load models in standard formats | Verify model accuracy and completeness |
| Equipment Ratings | Transmission line ratings, transformer MVA, generator capability | Validate against verified source data |
| Generator Parameters | MW/MVAr capability, inertia, impedances, control modes | Confirm consistency with verified capability (MOD-025) |
| Load Data | Peak demand, load forecasts, load composition, characteristics | Ensure load representation accuracy |
| Data Exchange Records | Submission logs, email trails, data request responses, version tracking | Demonstrate timely compliance with data requests |
| Change Management Logs | Equipment modification records, model update history, version control | Track data updates triggered by system changes |
| Prior Audit Findings | Previous NERC findings, mitigation plans, data quality issues | Address known deficiencies and improve processes |
Common MOD-032 Compliance Failure Points
Understanding data quality pitfalls helps entities maintain compliance:
Inconsistent Data Between Entities
Same facility having different parameters across PC, TP, and RC models. Results from uncoordinated updates, manual data entry errors, or poor data synchronization. Creates unreliable study results and indicates data governance failures.
Outdated Models
Planning models not reflecting recent equipment changes, generator retirements, new interconnections, or transmission upgrades. Equipment modifications must trigger data updates within specified timeframes. Late updates create compliance violations.
Missing Data Submissions
Failure to respond to PC/TP/RC data requests within required timeframes. Missing submissions prevent planners from conducting required studies. Requires tracking systems for data requests and submission deadlines.
Poor Documentation of Updates
Data changes without documented rationale, version control, or change logs. Auditors require evidence showing what changed, when, why, and what triggered update. Undocumented changes create traceability gaps.
No Data Verification Process
Submitting data without internal validation checks. Data should be verified against source documents (nameplate, test reports, verified models) before submission. Unverified data leads to errors propagating across planning entities.
Poor Communication Between Departments
Engineering, operations, and planning teams not coordinating data updates. Equipment modifications known to one group but not communicated to data submission team. Requires cross-functional data governance processes.
Multiple Conflicting Sources of Truth
Different databases, spreadsheets, or systems maintaining conflicting equipment data. Prevents consistent data submission. Requires single-source-of-truth architecture and data governance ensuring one authoritative data set.
Unclear Data Submission Obligations
Uncertainty about what data must be provided, to whom, and when. MOD-032 requirements vary by functional entity and planning relationships. Requires clear obligation mapping and tracking of all data submission requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MOD-032?
Who must comply with MOD-032?
What data is covered by MOD-032?
How often must data be updated?
What evidence is required for MOD-032?
How is data consistency verified?
What happens if data is late?
Are dynamic models always required?
How detailed must generator data be?
What are common MOD-032 audit findings?
How do equipment changes trigger data updates?
Can data be submitted in any format?
How does MOD-032 relate to other MOD standards?
What if planning entities request conflicting data?
How does eGridSync support MOD-032 compliance?
Official References
For complete standard requirements and technical guidelines, refer to official NERC resources:
Important: This page summarizes MOD-032 compliance concepts in original language for educational purposes. Always refer to the official NERC standard for authoritative requirements. eGridSync does not copy or reproduce NERC standard text.
Related NERC Compliance & Modeling Services
Ready to Ensure MOD-032 Compliance?
For data verification, consistency checks, and MOD-032 compliance support, contact eGridSync today.